The Ontological Argument in PVS ∗

نویسنده

  • John Rushby
چکیده

The Ontological Argument, an 11th Century proof of the existence of God, is a good candidate for Fun With Formal Methods as nearly everyone finds the topic interesting. We formalize the Argument in PVS and verify its correctness. The formalization raises delicate questions in formal logic and provides an opportunity to show how these are handled, soundly and efficiently, by the predicatively-subtyped higher-order logic of PVS and its mechanized support. The simplicity of the Argument, coupled to its bold conclusion, raise interesting issues on the interpretation and application of formal methods in the real world.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Mechanized Analysis Of a Formalization of Anselm’s Ontological Argument by Eder and Ramharter∗

Eder and Ramharter [7] propose requirements to be satisfied by formal reconstructions of informal arguments and illustrate these with their own reconstructions of Anselm’s Ontological Argument: one in classical (higher-order) logic, and one in modal logic. I reproduce and mechanically check their classical reconstruction in the PVS verification system and present this as an illustration of the ...

متن کامل

21 7 + ( , 03266

In this paper I present a novel objection to ontological arguments. The argument concerns ontological arguments in general and has the general form of a reductio ad absurdum. Roughly, it rests on the fact that if a sound ontological argument were available, it would contradict the very nature of God. For God aims at maximising the development of human good qualities (including thus faith) and i...

متن کامل

The Ontological Parody: A Reply to Joshua Ernst’s “Charles Hartshorne and the Ontological Argument”

Charles Hartshorne argues that Kant’s criticisms of Anselm’s onto­ logical argument were not directed against its strongest formulation. Kant criticised the argument on the famous grounds that existence is not a predicate (B620–30); however, Hartshorne argued that there is a modal distinction that needs to be made between existing contingently and existing necessarily, and while “existence” per...

متن کامل

Religion ) The Design Argument

The design argument is one of three main arguments for the existence of God; the others are the ontological argument and the cosmological argument. Unlike the ontological argument, the design argument and the cosmological argument are a posteriori. And whereas the cosmological argument could focus on any present event to get the ball rolling (arguing that it must trace back to a first cause, na...

متن کامل

The One Fatal Flaw in Anselm’s Argument

Anselm’s Ontological Argument fails, but not for any of the various reasons commonly adduced. In particular, its failure has nothing to do with violating deep Kantian principles by treating ‘exists’ as a predicate or making reference to ‘Meinongian’ entities. Its one fatal flaw, so far from being metaphysically deep, is in fact logically shallow, deriving from a subtle scope ambiguity in Anselm...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013